- The meaning of Law of contract
- What constitutes a contract
THE MEANING OF THE LAW OF CONTRACT
Contract law is often codified in a legal system and outlines the rules and principles that govern agreements between parties. It sets out the requirements for a valid contract, the rights and obligations of the parties involved, and the consequences of breach or failure to perform contractual obligations.
Contract law covers various chapters and cases that define how contracts are formed, executed, and enforced. Here's a brief summary:
1. Establishment of the contract:
Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines the elements of a valid contract including offer, acceptance, lawful consideration, competent party, free consent, lawful object and certainty.
Case: Carrill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) established that a unilateral offer can create a binding contract upon fulfillment of certain conditions.
2. Capacity and Consent:
Sections 11 to 14 deal with the capacity to enter into contracts, including those of minors, persons of unsound mind and persons disqualified by law.
Case: Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903) emphasized the importance of free consent and declared that contracts entered into with minors or persons lacking capacity were voidable.
3. Considerations and Legalities:
Sections 23 to 30 deal with legitimate considerations, objects and agreements opposed to public policy.
Case: Balfour v Balfour (1919) shows that an agreement between spouses that is not intended to create a legal relationship may not be legally binding.
4. Performance and Discharge:
Sections 37 to 67a outline the various modes of performance and discharge of a contract, including performance, breach, frustration and remedies.
Case: Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) established the principles for determining consequential damages arising from breach of contract.
5. Interpretation and execution:
Sections 12, 56 and 73 deal with the interpretation of ambiguous terms, the principle of frustration and measures of damages for breach of contract.
Case: Parke v. Daily News Ltd. (1962) illustrates the court's approach to interpreting contract terms.
6. Void and voidable contracts:
Sections 2(g), 10 and 19 define void agreements and voidable contracts due to duress, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake.
Case: Lalachand v. Jainabai (1940) dealt with contracts arising out of undue influence, rendering those contracts void.
Knowledge of these sections and cases is critical to understanding the nuances of contract law, ensuring a fair and legal agreement between parties, and providing remedies in the event of a dispute or breach of contract.
WHAT CONSTITUTES A CONTRACT
There are several key elements that constitute a valid contract under Nigerian law as set out in various sections and supported by legal precedents:
1. Offer and Acceptance (sections 1-4):
Section 1 defines an offer as a proposal intended to establish legal relations upon acceptance.
Section 2 requires a valid acceptance reflecting the terms of the offer.
Case: Tukur v Government of Gongora State (1989) highlighted the importance of a clear, communicated offer and consequential acceptance.
2. Intention to create legal relationship (Section 5):
Section 5 examines whether the parties’ agreement is legally binding.
Case: Esso Petroleum v. Mardon (1976) highlighted the importance of the parties’ intentions being legally binding, especially in commercial agreements.
3. Considerations (sections 6-9):
Section 6 requires an exchange of benefits or damages between the parties.
Case: Thomas v. Thomas (1842) Clarifies that consideration need not be sufficient, but must be sufficient.
4. Capacity (sections 10-12):
Section 10 provides that the parties entering into the contract must have legal capacity.
Case: Osagie v. Uzamere (1972) discussed the capacity of a minor and its effect on contracts.
5. Consent (sections 13-21):
Sections 13-21 address issues such as error, fraud, misrepresentation, coercion and undue influence that may affect consent.
Case: Adamu v. Jibrin (1998) illustrates how undue influence can render a contract void.
6. Legality of objects (section 22):
Section 22 stipulates that the subject matter and consideration of the contract must be legal.
Case: Aromolaran v. Awoyemi (2012) highlighted the invalidity of contracts for illegal goods.
7. Formalities (sections 23-26):
Sections 23-26 set out the formalities required for certain types of contracts, such as written contracts for land transactions.
Case: Briggs v. Olabode (1998) emphasized that certain contracts must comply with formalities before they can be enforced.
Together, these chapters and cases establish the essential components required for the formation and validity of a contract under Nigerian law. They emphasize agreement, intention, consideration, legality, capacity, consent and, in some cases, required formalities. Each case serves as a precedent for the interpretation and application of these principles in the context of Nigerian contract law.
No comments:
Post a Comment